|
Post by Kahlessa on Feb 13, 2008 22:26:58 GMT -5
Next is going to China! Here’s the press release from Harper Collins: Harper Collins Announces Chinese Publication of Next by Bestselling Author Michael CrichtonJilin Publishing Group and HarperCollins to Publish Four Crichton Titles in 2008www.harpercollins.com/footer/release.aspx?id=636&b=&year=2008And a story in Publishers Weekly: HC Exports Crichton to China; Acquires More Local TitlesBy Rachel Deahl, Publishers Weekly, 1/9/2008 7:13:00 AM www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6518417.htmlI wonder how Gerard the Parrot is going to come across in Chinese?
|
|
|
Post by Lukaran on Feb 18, 2008 18:51:16 GMT -5
Gerard's popular culture references are going to be a witch to translate, I bet! Maybe they can find similar references in chinese movies and stuff.
|
|
|
Post by Kahlessa on Feb 19, 2008 22:51:07 GMT -5
Perhaps but some of those lines, if not most of them, are so culturally based that they'll have to be changed completely to something that would resonate with the Chinese culture. I would love to talk to whoever is doing the translation about how they manage it!
|
|
|
Post by Kahlessa on Mar 4, 2008 14:03:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Kahlessa on Apr 10, 2008 23:15:36 GMT -5
Lawyers Fight DNA Samples Gained on SlyBy Amy Harmon, NY Times, April 3, 2008 The two Sacramento sheriff detectives tailed their suspect, Rolando Gallego, at a distance. They did not have a court order to compel him to give a DNA sample, but their assignment was to get one anyway — without his knowledge. Recently, the sheriff’s cold case unit had extracted a DNA profile from blood on a towel found 15 years earlier at the scene of the murder of Mr. Gallego’s aunt. If his DNA matched, they believed they would finally be able to close the case.... www.nytimes.com/2008/04/03/science/03dna.html
|
|
|
Post by Kahlessa on May 2, 2008 6:25:10 GMT -5
Congress Passes Bill to Bar Bias Based on GenesBy Amy Harmon, NY Times, May 2, 2008 A bill that would prohibit discrimination by health insurers and employers based on the information that people carry in their genes won final approval in Congress on Thursday by an overwhelming vote....www.nytimes.com/2008/05/02/health/policy/02gene.html
|
|
|
Post by Kahlessa on Sept 17, 2008 19:25:17 GMT -5
A Dissenting Voice as the Genome Is Sifted to Fight DiseaseBy NICHOLAS WADE, NY Times, September 15, 2008 The principal rationale for the $3 billion spent to decode the human genome was that it would enable the discovery of the variant genes that predispose people to common diseases like cancer and Alzheimer’s. A major expectation was that these variants had not been eliminated by natural selection because they harm people only later in life after their reproductive years are over, and hence that they would be common...www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/science/16prof.html
|
|
|
Post by Lukaran on Sept 22, 2008 16:51:18 GMT -5
Reality never lives up the the hype, it seems.
|
|
|
Post by Kahlessa on Mar 28, 2012 22:00:05 GMT -5
|
|